From now on I’m going to start approaching how I treat people through a specific aesthetic, just to try something new. This was an indirect inspiration from finishing one of my lecturer/mentor’s books. I am going to utilize the aesthetic of hospitality to welcome ‘guests’ into my ‘house’. In other words, how to make their stay as comfortable and fulfilling as possible?
I will approach this through two methods: firstly, the ’space’, and the ‘body/room correspondence’. Now there are two concepts of space. The first is a more straightforward conception, in which one invites the other person or people to a social event in one’s being, or dwelling (I use ‘dwelling’ because dwelling can mean a physical home as well as one’s being). When I invite you over to my house, if you decline, fine. It is not right for me to coerce you to a house party, no matter how much I want to entertain you or please you. I’ll just be entertaining and pleasing myself, not my guest. Therefore to give a person space is very much like in real life. Would I force you to talk to me or share your problems? Of course not. Space is precious and to crowd the space even before the person has agreed to visit your house is stupid.
Let’s just say you’ve accepted my invitation to visit me, i.e. have chosen to interact with me. We come now to the second version of space. ‘Space’ in a house is very important, in other words, how we choose to treat the person as a visitor. We often approach people with an agenda in our daily interactions, whether it may be good or bad, selfish or admirable. But if we approach the person with an agenda of care and compassion, ironically, we will be forced to drop all our agendas as well, because this is akin to giving her a seat in the lounge, offering her a cup of tea or water, and simply sitting down and giving her the space needed to re-orient herself to her new surroundings (your house, or your being). Would I suddenly demand a discussion on Hua-Yen metaphysics and ontology before you had even put your bag down and sat on my couch? Of course not, because this is MY agenda. YOU probably want to talk to me about your problems at work, home, or university. You probably want to play video games. Whatever it may be, if you have taken the first step to invite someone inside, she is a guest and has the priority treatment.
Furthermore, I need to have put aside all work and other distractions in preparation for your visit. If you walked into my study and saw me feverishly typing away on an essay (complete with headphones thundering hard rock music), would you feel comfortable as a guest? No, you’d feel like you were a bother, someone who was getting in the way. Therefore when you interact with someone you should also ‘drop everything’, and give her the full openness that you would give a visitor in your house. Otherwise, she will get the message that she is not entirely ‘welcome’.
Now we get to the ‘body/room correspondence’. I propose that like a house, we can relate our interactions with people with a metaphorical ‘house’ inside our own bodies. Hence our heart becomes the ‘lounge’ or ‘living room’, where our social interactions occur most often (friendship is where the heart is), our brain with the study, and the bedroom with guess what, our sexy organs. My current classmates see more of my study than my lounge. My friends from college and my old high schools are often hanging around in my ‘lounge’, where the academic facade is dropped and we commune like children again, and I’m not telling you who gets to spend time in my bedroom. ^_^. Mind you, I don’t like restricting fun in the bedroom to merely ‘in the bedroom’, if you know what I mean! It applies to other body/room correspondences. My classmates are also my friends, hence I cannot be academic with them all the time, I can’t just lock them up in my study, up in my brain, where there is no room for the intimacy and the dropping of guards, the relaxing of tongues and the soothing of troubles. No, I’d like to invite them inside my heart, to hang around in my lounge or fireplace.
Of course, as you interact more and more with someone, she gets more ‘familiar’ with you, and your house. She remembers well what your study is like, what your lounge is like, maybe what your bedroom is like… :) But you can see the parallel here. The frequent visitor is your close friend, your mother or father, your child, or your girlfriend. You may have a teacher or professor who you discuss and learn under frequently. This means he is is a common guest in your study. Do you have a group of friends you grew up with? They probably dwell in your heart often when you see them. Either way, this correspondence is to help oneself prepare space for the Other when he comes, so that ’space’ is given not only to give the guest of your interactions choice, comfort and freedom, but also to let them ‘tour’ your whole house, or your whole ‘dwelling’ if you wish them to.
When a guest visits, you want to make it as nice as possible. You should treat everyday situations in the same way, treating your body and mind like a nice home where a person, whether a friend or stranger, would like to stay for as long as possible. I understand that this aesthetic suffers from a flaw, and that is the flaw of preferential treatment. We rarely invite strangers over, yet we interact with strangers everyday. How can we treat strangers like ‘guests’ in our dwelling then? This is a problem. Furthermore, most of us value some guests over others. How do we practice spiritual equanimity if we’d rather interact with someone over another?
Therefore, I am working on resolving these two problems to my new theory. But otherwise, I am going to give it a try. Maybe you can too. If you do, get back to me and tell me if it works or not.
That’s all for tonight, until next time, folks.



the art of social relations is something that has died off; replaced by informal bonds, and ad-hoc measures. It would be nice to have a set of established protocols again.
Society has gotten so lax about everything–compared with the social graces as found in Emily Post, etc etc–that we seemed to have gone way too far the other way into casualness, if not a lack of caring altogether.
I hope you’ll report back at some point and let us know how your need approach works. I, for one, would like such an atmosphere.
Malcolm
I actually don’t think social relations have died off – rather, they have become stagnated, and unwilling to move forward towards a spiritual ethic of compassion and inclusiveness. For example, when was the last time you really interacted with someone different to how you would interact with everyone else? This just goes to show that the social zeitgeist is in stagnation.
You’ve written a highly insightful and innovative treatment on how one should entertain visitors of various degrees of intimacy to oneself to your place, especailly with regard to the analogy of the various parts of a house to those of our body. I don’t think it’s essential that you solve the flaw in the analogy that one doesn’t invite strangers to one’s house while one interacts with them every day. It may not be a flaw in the analogy after all, because a house has got its exterior as well as its interior, and when we interact with strangers with our greetings, our aloofness, or our warmth, it’s pretty much like we let them see the outside of our house with different degrees of decoration of our front yard, garage, lawn, etc. These strangers might just make a brief stop at our front yard and then leave, or might stay around and continue to chat and come back a few more times, just like with some we might just exchange a hello or so and with some others we might gradually talk more with each other. With some of them we might gradually or quickly get acquainted to the extent that we feel safe to open up ourselve more, and that’s like the time we invite them to go into our house. In any case, the notion of allowing “space” for our visitors still applies in the case of strangers: we should allow space for the strangers to decide how close she’s prepared to approach the exterior of the house, and when she’s prepared to enter its interior.
BTW, what’s the name of this book of your mentor’s? I’d like to see if I could get in from the uni library to have a read.
The book is called Moving Toward Spiritual Maturity: Psychological, Contemplative, and Moral Challenges in Christian Living. By Neil Pembroke.